At stake in Stockton’s upcoming elections is whether the grifters accused of plundering Stockton Unified and triggering an FBI investigation will win a majority on the Stockton City Council.
But you wouldn’t know it from most candidate forums, campaign ads, or news coverage. The word “corruption” is rarely uttered, rarely treated as an important issue, though corruption is the biggest threat to Stockton government at present.
“Stockton has been plagued by the twin demons of incompetence and corruption,” mayoral candidate Dan Wright, alone for months the only candidate to discuss the elephant in the room, said at a recent forum.
Wright elaborated on the weird lack of attention to the issue: “If I don’t know who was responsible for the Stockton Unified corruption — and the district lost over $3 million — then some of them may be connected to the City of Stockton positions or may be themselves running for positions in the city of Stockton.”
Of course they are. And almost nobody’s informing the public. But if there are corrupt elements in politics, they must be called out.
Mayor Kevin Lincoln has the bully pulpit, but he has not said
Word One. It appears he saw the role the 209 Times misinformation website played in the downfall of previous Mayor Michael Tubbs and decided to go along to get along.
The vaunted FBI hasn’t popped anybody or issued any report. Ditto the San Joaquin County District Attorney, Ron Freitas, who announced his office would investigate. And, Mr. Freitas?
Alleging fiscal misdeeds, the San Joaquin County Sheriff’s Office, the only agency to take action, raided the house of the one apparently honest Stockton Unified board member, Angel Ann Flores.
Deputies seized her records, humiliating her, but the D.A. has filed no charges. It’s unclear if the Sheriff put Flores through the wringer because he thinks she’s dirty or because he thinks she’s honest.
Local media hasn’t distinguished itself, either. Hey, colleagues, the back-room boys are trying to take over the Stockton government. Do you think you might like to ask candidates about it?
For journos who said no, a question: Why did you get into this business?
I attended the League of Women Voters candidate forums. Candidates were asked about crime. About homelessness. About infrastructure — potholes — but nothing about the threat to city government.
It’s as if Stockton residents are living in the alternate reality of a science fiction novel.
Not all, thankfully: A bipartisan roster of candidates for San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors and Stockton City Council released a principled mailer “in opposition to the 209 Times and will take a stand against its corruption.”
Mayoral Candidate Jesus Andrade released a video spot denouncing “deceptive media, like the 209 Times.” “Stockton needs a mayor who will choose principle over politics and refuse to capitulate to self-serving special interests,” he said in a statement.
Council candidate Mario Enriquez: “I want to share that I’m also against 209 Times … and ready to call out corruption.”
Thanks to these candidates, among others. Better late than never.
If any type of unscrupulous candidates win a majority, this is how I see it playing out:
The first thing they’ll do is fire honest, competent City Manager Harry Black. They’ll replace him with an apparent co-conspirator like they did at Stockton Unified. Then they’ll plunder the treasury.
They’ll bid-rig for kickbacks. They’ll take a cut off grant money. They’ll elbow competent and honest city employees out of good-paying jobs and replace them with incompetent relatives and cronies. They’ll move the public information authority to the mayor’s office, and you’ll never get a straight answer out of them again, unless it serves their purposes. They won’t comply with California Public Records Act requests. They won’t grant interviews to journalists who ask tough questions.
Meanwhile, millions of dollars will disappear from this already cash-strapped city. Governance will be a travesty. Potholes will take on lunar dimensions.
A growing number of people see the site for what it is: an unscrupulous political operation that appears to trade money and good press for cooperation, turns a blind eye to their clients’ misdeeds, and shamelessly smears their opponents.
It’s about money, power, and jobs. Here’s an example involving their wholehearted stooge on the council, Michele Padilla. When Padilla took office, she (tearfully!) thanked her “management team” of Motecuzoma Sanchez and Frank Gayaldo, the two main characters behind the 209 Times.
Subsequently, Padilla appointed Sanchez, who had run for Stockton office but was repeatedly rejected by voters, to the Charter Review Advisory Commission. Padilla helped one of the worst actors in Stockton politics build his resume.
But that’s how they roll: You scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours. What the public needs is irrelevant.
Which brings us to mayoral candidates. The 209 Times has shown support in the past for two: Tom Patti and Christina Fugazi. That alone raises serious questions about the candidates’ agenda and associates.
But each has additional drawbacks, in my opinion.
Patti, a two-term San Joaquin County Supervisor, may be the frontrunner. He gets earned media for being in office thus name recognition, has a sizable war chest, and is campaigning aggressively.
But Patti is a poor leader. “One of the worst I’ve ever seen, and you have to remember I served for quite a while with Anthony Silva,” the disgraced former Stockton mayor, said Kathy Miller, who served two terms with Patti on the board of supes.
Patti seldom gets his ideas off the ground, Miller said, because his shortcomings cost him needed votes.
“You have to, with your fellow electeds, be realistic about including them in the process with you. Tom doesn’t do that.”
As the county developed a housing-first shelter policy to address homelessness, Patti championed a showboat megashelter. It went nowhere.
Patti also appears to believe in Old School cronyism. One example (among numerous ones) involved county redistricting. Patti recommended a team who could lead the effort for around $300,000. Only after the board hired them did it come to light that the team featured Patti’s Sacramento political consultant, Tab Berg, and a campaign donor.
The board rescinded the contract. County staff then did the job for around $40,000.
“It isn’t that he doesn’t get that you shouldn’t be bringing projects that benefit your friends, families, and acquaintances,” Miller said. “He thinks it’s completely fine.”
Patti also has a hostile streak. “He insults people publicly if you don’t agree with him. He has on occasion stooped to name calling,” Miller
A nonstop feuder, Patti filed numerous ethics complaints against board enemies and associates. The resulting county investigations cost taxpayers tens of thousands of dollars. None proved true.
But an investigation into him found he bullied a female staffer so badly that the board censured him.
Patti alluded to his combative side at a recent candidates forum: “Sometimes I ruffle a few feathers, but I get things done.”
He’ll find it harder to get things done as Stockton’s mayor. On the five-person Board of Supervisors he needs to muster only a 3-person majority. On the 7-person council he would need four votes. His record suggests he’ll feud with opponents, not win them over.
Christina Fugazi, having served on the Planning Commission and City Council, is a seasoned leader as well. She appears truly committed to championing the under-represented.
“I am a public school educator,” she said at a forum. “I don’t pick and choose who I teach.” As a politician, “I don’t pick and choose who I serve,” she boasted.
Her other drawback involves two things a mayor needs to be effective: a council majority and a constructive relationship with the city manager. A populist, Fugazi seems rational enough to command a council majority sometimes, though outlier enough to alienate it at others; but she seems never to have met a city manager she can support (though she spoke favorably of Harry Black at the most recent forum and the Stocktonia debate). With populist cynicism toward the establishment, she seems to think them all dictatorial and indifferent to the masses. City managers return the disapproval.
The primary question about both candidates, however, remains what, if anything, they promised the 209 Times people in exchange for support.
If you find that question unsettling, demand an answer. Better still, select from the other mayoral candidates, Jesus Andrade, Jessica Velez, Shakeel Ahmad, and Dan Wright. They offer a choice between politicos with no toxic affiliations.
Michael Fitzgerald’s column runs on Wednesdays. On Twitter and Instagram as Stocktonopolis. Email: mfitzgeraldstockton@gmail.com.


EXCELLENT ARTICLE — ONE THAT ALL WHO CARE ABOUT STOCKTON NEEDS TO READ!!! The smoke-shop, backdoor deals made between 209 Times supported candidates and those who operate the site is the greatest threat to the future of this city and her residents!
Nice article – albeit ONE sided… I am NOT in support of the 209 Times “news media outlet” as Montec puts it. Ask the public to view the 2/21/2024 City Council meeting and to listen to Montec’s public comments – those comments pretty much summarize him…
As for Harry Black, “Mr. Metrics and Data” carries himself like God’s gift to Stockton, take for example his recent appearance at Van Buskirk Rec Center to celebrate the new floor. Lots of parking in the parking lot, but what does Harry do? Parks in the RED NO PARKING ZONE in his elite Cadillac SUV. WTF? You also hit on Patti, Padilla, Fugazi…NO mention of the other bumbling fool DAN WRIGHT? Wright and Fugazi want to be Mayor-uh, they have been around so long, THEY ARE WHAT GOT STOCKTON in the trouble it’s in NOW!!! Listen to Fugazi & Wright talk about how LONG they have been around…Wright touts his experience in SUSD (<— messed up & he WAS THERE!!!), Fugazi states "Stockton wasn't like this when I was on the council – HA! A "clean" Stockton? If you elect her, what a LAUGH! Losers all the way around…
I have going that Mr. Wright is anything but “bumbling”. If you would check you would find that in addition to representing his district he has been expanding his knowledge of city Mgt. He has accomplished this by participating on a couple of Committees in Sacramento. Again, previously an admistator in the field of Education If we wish to get the real truth re: Stocton Unified and continue our wonderful Mr. Black vote Mr Wright for Mayor!
Any association with 209 Times should be disqualifying. Wright has my vote and that of my family. He’s been a stable influence without controversy in his years in the city council. He also has strong connections with state and county officials — and absolutely no association with 209 Times.
I understand Mr. Fitzgerald’s intense dislike for 209 Times. It seems, however, that evaluation of City candidates for Mayor and Council should extend beyond implied association with that lurid source of news about car accidents, dumpster fires and partisan combat known as political consultancy.
I deeply respect and genuinely like Mr. Wright. But on the Council, he and a majority have been deferential to the City Manager and have not insisted on proper accounting and oversight of Measure A. He and the majority opposed a proper City Auditor. We continue to have a consultant serve as the City Auditor. The City Auditor told the Measure A committee he does not try to find anything wrong with the City and the Measure A committee should rely on a “leap of faith” to discharge its oversight responsibilities.
Ms. Fugazi has pressed for proper accounting, audits and transparency in fiscal affairs including Measure A matters. Accordingly, she has expressed, at times, opposition to the policies and decisions of the City Manager.
To me, the fiscal dimensions are especially important and should be a major factor in deciding who should serve as Mayor and on the Council of our beloved Stockton.
In the case of Ms. Fugazi — there is no “implied association” with 209 Times. She is as intimately tied to the site as she is to its founder Motec Sanchez, and to disgraced former mayor Anthony Silva. Like Kevin Lincoln, she has accepted its support while silently benefiting from the lies and vile attacks it levies against her opponents. She has had ample opportunity to disassociate herself from the site and has chosen not to — and has yet to address the investigation she was under as Vice Principal of Edison high school. If “transparency” is what she claims to be running on — she needs to start there.
fugazi tried to appoint sanchez to a committee in 2015. This is an important election, folks. Either we fall to corruption or we fight it. Please research your candidates and the history of each and every player in this election.
Well Said!
Anthony Silva is a POS. His “Vote for my Daddy” signs around Stockton are a disgrace and laughing stock. He is the most corrupt of them all and is in bed with Motec, the 209 Times, and Fugazi. He can’t maintain and work for an honest living, so he has decided to rape and pillage all the entities of Stockton government until there is nothing left but burning rubble for him to dance on. Evil.
I choked when I saw those “Vote for my Daddy” signs.
Yes another excellent article.
But this city has suffered this for as long as I can remember.
My own cousin was recalled as mayor back in 68?
In 8th grade we were assigned a mandatory act: to attend a city council meeting.
My best friend and I rode our bikes to complete the assignment.
Now our whole goal in life at that time was to laugh.
We laughed so hard at the proceedings we came back the next week for entertainment.
This city’s problem is not these ugly americans.
It’s US.
We ve been allowing these sick people to continue, out in the open as fitzgerald describes.
I can call you all out because I wasn’t in stockton from ’77 to ’13.
I this towns integrity is horrible.
Now I’ll end with this.
Lincoln has multiple donations from regional builders unions.
Who builds in stockton? I know that Lincoln village was whites only when it developed.
Fitzgerald complains about the media complicity.
But he has to accept his portion of the fault.
He was the only opinion writer for years.
He definitely gave gum service to these issues, but never put his teeth in.
There’s a reason for this.
Can he give us a retrospective about why that happened.
I’m very much leaning towards Wright.
The rest should be shamed.
EDIT ABOVE
(Mayor) Lincoln has multiple donations from regional builders unions.
I’m very much leaning towards (voting for) Wright (for mayor).
I’m with you on that! (Y)
Corruption is almost always a buried subject until it is so obvious that it is a community embarrassment. Politics itself involves a lot of backroom dealing and jockeying for position. The election of principled leaders is the best guard against corruption. In my view, we are known by our association with others. 209 Times has the smell of something unethical and can not be trusted as a news source. Politicians accepting support of 209 Times pick up that smell and likewise become suspect. If candidates don’t have the good judgement to avoid association and identification with bad actors, should we also question whether or not they the necessary skills and qualities to ensure good governance?